Columns
Stay out of the wrong castle
Detractors of Mississippi’s new “Castle doctrine” law are fretting as Senate Bill 2426 goes into effect this week. They say that the law legitimizes the notion of “shoot first and ask questions later.”
They say that the law will make it easier for criminals to claim self-defense when they kill someone. They say that the law will encourage more people to buy guns and empower them to use them without fear of civil liability if they injure or kill someone.
All three of those criticisms are correct.
But there’s a simple solution to those problem areas in the “Castle doctrine.”
People who stay out of the wrong “castle” should be fine. It’s difficult to be shot as an intruder if one only enter homes or cars or businesses to which one has both a key to gain entrance and a legal right to be on the premises.
The new law removes the “duty to retreat” when one is threatened in their home, car or in the street. It also removes civil liability from killing an intruder or attacker.
But the protections don’t apply when a person claims self-defense when shooting a law enforcement officer or another person who has a lawful right to be on the premises of the shooting. Further, the “duty to retreat” has never existed in state law prior to the adoption of the “Castle doctrine.”
But that’s mostly legalese.
The safety valve for the “Castle doctrine” is for burglars, crackheads, carjackers, strong arm robbers, muggers, rapists, thieves and other assorted boils on the butt of humanity to stay out of homes, cars, stores, offices and other domiciles that don’t belong to them and to stop mugging, robbing, raping and stealing.
Those who utilize that course of action aren’t terribly likely to be shot. Those who don’t likely will be.
The notion that homeowners, young single women, elderly widows or business people should find themselves the victims of crime and feel it necessary to run down a checklist before defending their lives, the lives of their loved ones or their property before taking action is ridiculous.
This law doesn’t turn Mississippi into Dodge City. It simply defines the circumstances in which innocent people can make an effort to protect themselves. In the broader sense, the law does something else — or should.
The “Castle doctrine” should serve notice on those who choose a life of crime that the consequences of that choice may prove dire indeed — and that potential victims may indeed “shoot first and ask questions later.”
Again, there’s a safety valve for those criminals. It’s called not breaking the law in the first place.
The thing that makes the “Castle doctrine” a viable law as opposed to an exercise in political pandering to the gun lobby is that most gun owners were already living by the doctrine.
On the street, gun owners and even some law enforcement types understood that if they shot and intruder, they might want to pull the body inside the door or window rather than leaving it outside.
But for most Mississippians who own handguns and long guns as well, the idea of not protecting one’s property with deadly force was never an option. This state is too rural and too plagued with drug crime for it to be otherwise.
In addition to property crimes, the notion that civil liability should exist for a driver who uses a pistol to fend off a carjacker or other intruder is ludicrous.
Women attacked in department store parking lots, elderly women along in rural settings or anyone made prisoner in their own home by crime should have the right to feel safe in their own home. More than that, they should have the right to defend themselves.
I have no sympathy for criminals wounded or killed in the commission of their crimes by citizens under the “Castle doctrine” — because they were simply in the wrong castle at the wrong time.
Sid Salter is Perspective editor of The Clarion Ledger. Call him at (601) 961-7084 or e-mail him at ssalter@clarionledger.com.
- Columns
-
-
A Terrorist’s Bill of Rights?
The jurisdiction struggle over where the trial of Abdulmutallab, the Christmas Day airline bomber, should be held reveals the underlying fallacy of the Obama Administration’s efforts to try terrorists in civilian courts.
-
Uh oh, an idea was committed
Faced with catastrophic funding cuts for historically black universities and the Governor’s call to merge them, Ron Mason did what any thoughtful university president should do.
-
It’s been a long time coming!
I'm not real sure when I actually started loving football.
It could have been sometime near the day I learned to walk, talk, or maybe even as soon as I crawled the first time across a lawn and felt the grass on my knees and the smell of the earth. -
Calm down — don’t get paranoid
Saying "Don't get paranoid," is a lot like saying "Calm down." Both usually have the opposite effect.
-
More guts than sense. …
The first time these words were uttered to me (by my husband) that described, at the time, a most recent escapade -- I skidded to a stop and pondered the meaning. What did he really mean? Was I a courageous one with no marbles? No, I decided – he knew better. After all he did have to live with me! Then, as I became accustomed to the term ~ More guts than sense ~ I could see the compliment intended.
I have always dared to say that I blazed my own trail, encouraged adventure, and, well, I have enjoyed my life – my Blessed life. Yes, more guts than sense – that’s me. -
After-church meals and the nest
My family has many traditions. Some are centered around holidays, others are centered around seasons, most are centered around food. The oldest tradition in my family goes back three generations— the after-church meal on Sunday.
Years ago my grandmother always hosted the after-church meal. She usually cooked three weeks out of the month. The menu usually alternated on a rotation of roast beef, lamb, and turkey. -
Martin’s legacy’s one of Choctaw ‘self-determination’
Assessing the legacy of former Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Chief Phillip Martin - who was in critical condition at a Jackson hospital at deadline for release of this column - is an exercise that is incomplete without context.
At the time that Europeans were introduced into Mississippi in about 1540, there were about 20,000 members of the Choctaw tribe here, according to the writings of University of Oklahoma historian Arrell M. Gibson in A History of Mississippi. By 1900, the Choctaws in Mississippi had dwindled to about 2,000. Today, there are 9,660 Mississippi Choctaws. -
Balconies, Frames, and Budget Resolution
At heart, Mississippi leaders and legislators have good intentions.
-
Fitzgerald: a storyteller for the ages
Carl Fitzgerald was one of those people you knew you'd never forget within minutes of knowing him.
-
Apple’s New iPad: The iTouch on Steroids
Apple Computer released its much anticipated tablet January 27th and despite Apple’s claims of “magical” and “revolutionary” the general public has reacted mostly with disappointment and criticism.
- More Columns Headlines
-
A Terrorist’s Bill of Rights?
